Food and Beverage Industry Spotlight: Design Patents

The food and beverage industry differs from many other industries in terms of building an intellectual property portfolio, as much of the product development surrounds recipe development, and recipes typically end up falling under trade secret protection rather than patent protection. However, this does not mean that intellectual property aspects of a food and beverage business are not able to be protected under patent law.
            On the contrary, many aspects of food and beverage businesses may involve intellectual property that is patent eligible, and obtaining patents for these aspects of food and beverage businesses may prove to be a helpful protection strategy.
            Two main types of patent eligible property that tend to be developed in food and beverage businesses are utility related and design related intellectual property. As described by the USPTO, “a ‘utility patent’ protects the way an article is used and works (35 U.S.C. 101), while a ‘design patent’ protects the way an article looks (35 U.S.C. 171).”
            Seeking design patent protection may be particularly beneficial for a food and beverage business, as the look and feel of a product draws consumers to the product and helps consumers to remember the product in the future. Protecting the appearance of a product’s packaging may help a food and beverage business to protect their identity, even if copy cats mimic the recipe of the product.
            Coca-Cola is an excellent and famous example of a company in the food and beverage industry utilizing design patents to protect against competitors attempting to copy their product. In the early 1900s, Coca-Cola was rapidly growing in popularity, and with this rise in popularity, products imitating the famous Coca-Cola product also entered the market.
            In an attempt to prevent customer confusion and maintain their brand identity, The Coca-Cola Company asked for help in developing a bottle that would enable someone to identify their product by touch. So if someone were to grab a bottle of soda from an ice chest, for example, they would be able to tell which bottles were the Coca-Cola bottles without actually seeing the labels or the entire bottle.
            The resulting design was a bottle by the Root Glass Company with the iconic contoured Coca-Cola bottle shape that we still associate with Coca-Cola today. A design patent for the contoured bottle shape was obtained in 1915, and this design patent prevented competitors from imitating the shape of the Coca-Cola bottle as The Coca-Cola Company built their identity around the contoured bottle shape. So even though Coca-Cola’s product is a beverage, design patent protection proved to be a key business strategy to distinguish Coca-Cola from the competition.


            As shown in this case, though you may have a business in the food and beverage industry, there are still many options aside from trade secret to consider when developing your intellectual property portfolio, including design patent protection. In some cases, the package design may be more helpful in protecting your product from the competition than the recipe!

Popular posts from this blog

Surprising Uses for Oobleck

Image
Oobleck is a common name for a non-Newtonian fluid comprising cornstarch and water. Named after a substance humorously described in Dr. Seuss’s classic children’s story, Bartholomew and the Ooblek, the cornstarch and water concoction is frequently used in children’s science classes as a fun way to learn about fluid mechanics. You may have fond memories, yourself, of playing with oobleck as a youth. Oobleck behaves as a fluid when touched gently, but becomes hard as a solid when hit with great velocity. For example, a person could run across a swimming pool of oobleck without getting their feet wet. However, if a person stood still on the oobleck, then they would slowly sink. Because oobleck is a children’s plaything and because of its simple recipe (cornstarch and water), one may be surprised to learn that inventors have attempted to patent serious industrial uses for the material. As an example, one current patent application, US 2015/0016885 (now abandoned), is for a system of fi
Read more

Dispensing with the Formalities: Ex Parte Quayle Actions

Image
Checking my email after work one day, I was greeted with some unfortunate news: the application I was prosecuting had received yet another Office action.   Frustrated, I couldn’t resist skimming the substance of the rejection.   After all, like any patent practitioner, I thought my arguments were pretty irrefutable.   The news only got worse… or so it appeared.   The Office action was something called an “ Ex Parte Quayle action.”   Having never received one of these actions, I started mentally preparing myself to pull out the MPEP and research some arcane rejection. To my surprise, I didn’t find myself knee-deep in case law the following day.   Ex Parte Quayle actions, while somewhat inconvenient, are far from insurmountable.   In short, an Ex Parte Quayle action or “Quayle action” is issued when an application has objections remaining as to formal matters, but is otherwise allowable.   Accordingly, the mailing of these actions closes prosecution on the merits of the appl
Read more

Adaptive Headlight IP

Image
The recent Infrastructure bill signed into law by President Biden affects many things, but one aspect that affects the automotive world is adaptive headlights.  As noted by Jalopnik puts it somewhat crudely, this means “our headlights will suck way less” (link to https://jalopnik.com/finally-our-headlights-will-suck-way-less-1848067412 ). But with this sudden change, adaptive headlights in the US may be in for a particular messy IP situation since many companies may have considered it was not necessary to protect their adaptive headlight innovations in the US because of the 50-year old rule preventing such technology. Recent patents in the field from applicants such as Lumileds and Arex indicate that smaller players and startups may be able to break into the market which is expected to explode in the next few years once the final rules are implemented.  For those in the industry that have typically avoided US patent filings in the adaptive headlamp area, they may want to rethink th
Read more